2011 is likely Wall Street’s worst year since 1938
For most Wall Street bankers, 2011 was a year they would rather forget. Investors will soon find out just how bad that year was for America’s biggest financial institutions.
Remisier kings
The cousins who have taken over Peter Lim’s throne View PDF
Comments
The New York Times
09 January 2012
For most Wall Street bankers, 2011 was a year they would rather forget. Investors will soon find out just how bad that year was for America’s biggest financial institutions.
In recent days, analysts have been lowering their fourth-quarter earnings estimates for Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America. Analysts are also bracing for lower earnings from JPMorgan Chase, which on Friday will be the first of the Wall Street banks to report results.
“It’s likely 2011 will be the worst year for revenue growth for the banks since 1938, and so far 2012 isn’t feeling much better,” said Michael Mayo, an analyst with Credit Agricole Securities and the author of the recently published book Exile on Wall Street: One Analyst’s Fight to Save the Big Banks From Themselves.
“The industry simply grew too fast over the past two decades and now it’s downshifting. This process will take time, but the hit to revenue is happening now.”
Wall Street banks have been buffeted by a weak economy in the United States and by concerns that the European debt crisis will spread, sending shock waves through the financial system.
At the same time, most banks are expected to book an accounting loss in the fourth quarter from the performance of their own debt. In the previous quarter, this one-time item significantly bolstered the earnings of a number of banks.
With business sluggish, Wall Street banks have been chopping staff and expenses. A dismal 2011 will translate into smaller employee bonuses, which most banks will begin handing out in the coming weeks.
Compensation experts are estimating compensation for Wall Street employees could fall as much as 30 per cent from levels a year ago.
While sharply lower bonuses may be politically popular, they will also eat into the revenue that New York state collects from Wall Street. The challenges facing Wall Street are illustrated by the performance in recent quarters of Goldman Sachs - for years the envy of rivals for its ability to churn out rich profits even in rough times. In the third quarter, Goldman reported a loss of US$428 million, in contrast to a US$1.74 billion profit a year ago. Goldman’s chief executive, Lloyd Blankfein, told investors that Goldman was “disappointed” in the performance.
For the fourth quarter, the firm is projected to post a profit of US$2.02 a share, according to a survey of analysts by Thomson Reuters. That consensus number is down from US$2.81 a month ago. And it is likely to fall further in the coming days as more analysts weigh in with new estimates. Some analysts already have Goldman, which reports on January 18, earning less than US$1 a share in the fourth quarter.
Analysts are also notching down estimates for Goldman’s rival Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley was hit harder than Goldman by the financial crisis. While it is a major player in many areas Goldman dominates, like sales and trading, it decided after the financial crisis to make a big investment in wealth management, a lower risk business that tends to post steadier results.
So far the strategy, led by Morgan Stanley’s chief executive, James Gorman, appears to be taking hold. The firm earned US$2.15 billion in the third quarter, up from a loss of US$91 million in the year-earlier period.
In the fourth quarter, however, Morgan Stanley will be taking a substantial one-time pretax earnings hit of US$1.8 billion related to a recent legal settlement.
This will translate into a per-share hit of 64 cents and will most likely put Morgan Stanley into the red in the quarter. Analysts are predicting the bank will lose 54 US cents a share in the fourth quarter. A month ago, the consensus was for a profit of 29 US cents a share, according to Thomson Reuters.
Investors will also keep a close eye on Bank of America, which has also struggled to recover from the financial crisis.
JPMorgan Chase weathered the financial storm better than some, in part because it has a large retail bank that produces fairly steady earnings. Still, it owns a big investment bank and it is not immune to the same issues facing its rivals.
JPMorgan’s profit dipped 4 per cent, or US$1.02 a share, in the third quarter, in part because of lingering mortgage problems. Analysts are projecting the firm will post a profit of 93 US cents a share in the fourth quarter. The bank posted a per-share profit of US$1.12 in the fourth quarter of 2010.