TWO former senior employees of UOB Kay Hian Private Limited (UOBKH) were charged on Wednesday for allegedly lying to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in relation to reports on a then Catalist aspirant. Lan Kang Ming, 38, and Wee Toon Lee, 34, each face three charges of providing MAS with false information in October 2018 in relation to due diligence reports on an unidentified company applying to list on the Catalist board of the Singapore Exchange. MAS said in a media statement on Wednesday that it was performing an onsite inspection of UOBKH between June and August 2018, to assess the latter's controls, policies and procedures in relation to its role as an issue manager for Initial Public Offering (IPOs). During the examination, Lan and Wee were said to have provided different versions of a due diligence report relating to background checks on a company applying to be listed on the Catalist board of the Singapore Exchange. UOBKH had acted as the issue manager
Comments
31 Oct 2013
The Singapore Exchange (SGX) has been asked about the differences in regulatory actions taken in the case of Sky One Holdings and in the case of Asiasons Capital, Blumont Group and LionGold Corp.
Not all sharp price movements warrant a suspension of the stock. Each occurrence has to be evaluated on its own merit in the context of circumstances of the case.
In the case of Sky One, the SGX’s review of the circumstances revealed no threat to fair, orderly and transparent trading. Hence, no suspension occurred.
In the case of Blumont, Asiasons and LionGold, our review showed disorderliness in the market and lack of transparency that could also threaten the fairness of trading.
The same principle applies to the designation of stocks.
Each case is evaluated in the context of its own circumstances.
In the case of Sky One, designation was not necessary. But for Blumont, Asiasons and LionGold, designation was instituted to remove the froth of excessive speculation in the market and permit the fundamentals to assert themselves in determining market prices.
Both suspension and designation are measures that help to return the market to finding its own equilibrium.
For Blumont, Asiasons and LionGold, after the end of designation, the forces of supply and demand have reasserted themselves to determine the prices of the stocks. Normal trading conditions have resumed.
Investigation of market misconduct is separate and distinct from regulatory tools the SGX deploys to bring about fair, orderly and transparent trading in the market. It can be initiated by market activities observed during surveillance.
We understand the public wanting to know more about such investigations, but releasing information prematurely could jeopardise the integrity of the probe.
Furthermore, investigation into the trading of a particular security does not equate to the presence of wrongdoing. Nor does every investigation lead to conviction.
It would be unfair if the public announcement of an investigation tarnishes the reputation of the stock or of any individual investor.
Where market misconduct reflects possible breaches of the Securities and Futures Act, findings are referred to the relevant authorities that can exercise their statutory powers.
Readers may also want to refer to our regulatory announcement last Friday, “SGX corrects misconceptions”, available on our website.
Richard Teng
Deputy Chief Regulatory Officer
Singapore Exchange